Temporary Urban Retreats: The Complex Role of Alternative Spaces in Psychological Change
- Esther Adams-Aharony

- Jul 19
- 3 min read

Introduction
Can stepping away from the chaos of urban life really open the door to personal transformation? For many people, the answer lies not just in the change of scenery but in the structure and support surrounding that change. Research suggests that temporary removal from familiar urban stimuli—through relocation to alternative or transitional spaces—can have both positive and negative effects on a person’s readiness for change and psychological growth.
Dual Effects of Temporary Removal
Opportunities for Change
A break from urban pressures, whether in a retreat center, temporary housing, or structured alternative space, can offer rare clarity. For individuals grappling with chronic adversity, these environments can serve as a mental and emotional reset. They provide:
Moments of Reflection: Away from the noise and routine, people can step back and see their lives differently.
A Sense of Safety: With fewer distractions, clients may feel secure enough to explore difficult emotions or consider new life paths.
Inspiration for Change: These spaces often allow individuals to envision recovery, growth, or reorientation in ways that are harder to access in daily urban life (Karadzhov, 2023; Madanipour, 2018; Andres & Kraftl, 2021).
Barriers and Ambivalence
On the flip side, these settings can also magnify discomfort:
Uncertainty and Instability: Without clear structure or support, clients may feel ungrounded.
Boredom or Isolation: The absence of familiar activities or community can lead to disengagement.
Perceived Traps: If the setting is under-resourced or unpredictable, it may feel like a step backward rather than forward (Karadzhov, 2023; Madanipour, 2018).
Key Factors Influencing Openness to Change
Factor | Positive Impact on Openness | Negative Impact on Openness | References |
Socio-material resources | Enables recovery and change | Lack leads to stagnation | Karadzhov, 2023; Madanipour, 2018 |
Relational/affective support | Fosters envisioning change | Isolation hinders progress | Karadzhov, 2023; Madanipour, 2018 |
Environmental stability | Reduces existential stress | Volatility increases stress | Karadzhov, 2023; Madanipour, 2018; Andres & Kraftl, 2021 |
Contextual Considerations
The effects of temporary relocation are nuanced and depend heavily on context. Well-managed and supportive spaces can act as catalysts for transformation, while poorly resourced or isolating ones can reinforce stagnation or emotional shutdown.
Temporary urbanisms—the flexible use of space in cities—offer both opportunities for innovation and risks of precarity. Whether a client thrives or struggles in these environments depends on the quality of support and structure provided (Madanipour, 2018; Andres & Kraftl, 2021).
Conclusion
Temporary removal from the urban grind can either spark change or suppress it. The difference lies in the stability, resources, and relationships available in the alternative setting. For clinicians, planners, and support professionals, this means designing interventions that not only provide physical space but also foster emotional safety, consistency, and connectedness.
In short: A new environment alone is not enough. It's what comes with it—structure, support, and stability—that determines whether it becomes a launching pad for healing or just another detour.
References
Andres, L., & Kraftl, P. (2021). New directions in the theorisation of temporary urbanisms: Adaptability, activation and trajectory. Progress in Human Geography, 45(6), 1237–1253. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132520985321
Karadzhov, D. (2023). ‘Trials and Tribulations’: The Ambivalent Influence of Temporary Accommodation on Mental Health Recovery in Chronically Homeless Adults. Qualitative Health Research, 33(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221147127
Madanipour, A. (2018). Temporary use of space: Urban processes between flexibility, opportunity and precarity. Urban Studies, 55(5), 1093–1110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017705546
Synthesized with insights from Consensus, an AI-powered research engine. Explore more at https://consensus.app



Comments